Generative AI Policy

Generative AI Policy
P-ISSN: 3117-8316 E-ISSN: 3117-8324

International Journal of Contemporary Impediments in Commerce and Management recognizes that generative artificial intelligence tools may be used by authors for limited support in language improvement, grammar correction, formatting, and readability enhancement. However, the journal maintains strict standards of originality, academic integrity, ethical research, and responsible authorship.

Authors must ensure that the submitted manuscript represents their own direct intellectual contribution. The use of generative AI tools must never replace the author’s critical thinking, research analysis, empirical data interpretation, unique scholarly argument, or eventual responsibility for the entire content baseline of the manuscript.

Permitted Use of Generative AI

Authors may use generative AI tools strictly for limited and supportive linguistic workflows, such as:

• Improving grammar checkpoints, spelling verification, and layout sentence structure.
• Enhancing language clarity, stylistic articulation, and general readability metrics.
• Assisting with standard paragraph formatting and macro-organization of text sequences.
• Translating or refining non-substantive structural language elements.
• Evaluating consistency patterns across citation style guidelines and technical presentation layouts.

* Note: Any use of AI tools must be carefully reviewed and verified by the human authors before submission.

Strictly Prohibited AI Applications

The journal strictly prohibits the use of generative AI tools for misleading academic practices, including:

• Fabricating raw empirical data, results, or discoveries
• Generating false reference bibliographies or fake citations
• Producing artificial statistical analysis or conclusions
• Replacing the author's personal research input
• Writing substantial sections or entire text drafts automatically
• Deceptively manipulating source charts, figures, or images
• Intentionally concealing the use of AI assistance where formal declaration is requested
Author Accountability Clause

Authors hold complete accountability for all content submitted. Generative AI tools **cannot be listed as authors or co-authors** because they lack legal capacity to take ownership of research claims, approve final production layouts, handle reviewer feedback loops, or accept professional liability for published scholarship.

Formal Disclosure Protocol

If generative AI platforms are deployed in a material way during draft compilation, authors must explicitly disclose this context at submission. The statement must list the engine name and scope of utility (e.g., language refinement, formatting assistance). Minor grammar or spell-check sweeps do not require disclosure maps.

Editorial Review & Enforcement Actions

The editorial desk actively crosschecks received manuscripts for ethical compliance and improper markers of automated content generation. If unverified anomalies or undisclosed AI deployment indicators are noted, formal clarification inquiries will be triggered.

Depending on the severity of confirmed ethical policy violations, the journal reserves the absolute right to trigger file rejections, request heavy text revisions, withdraw accepted drafts from production lines, or initiate complete post-publication electronic Retractions.

Ethical Commitment

International Journal of Contemporary Impediments in Commerce and Management supports the responsible use of assistive technology in academic writing while rigidly safeguarding the highest benchmarks of scholarly integrity. The journal expects authors to handle generative AI tools ethically, transparently, and strictly as supportive secondary aids—never as an artificial substitute for original human research and academic responsibility.